(India) supplies not just Pier 1 and Target, but also creates products for Ikea, Ashley Furniture, Restoration Hardware, and Crate & Barrel. The graphic below features three of the manufacturers the company uses, as well as other recognizable brands using those same suppliers. Pier 1 and Target actually share a supplier, C L Gupta Export Ltd in India.Īnd while some brands own their own factories, larger companies (like Target and Pier 1) could have a few dozen - or even hundreds - of factories they source from.īut Target wasn’t the only company I found that shared one or more factories with Pier 1. And what do you know? My premonition was correct. Next, I picked one of the vendors they use to see who else uses them. So, to test my theory of the clocks being similar, I entered Pier 1 into the database’s search function and presto: out came a list of all the manufacturers that Pier 1 uses for their imports. Using this search feature, I can enter in keywords, vendors, and even companies to find out where items come from. It gives Amazon sellers the ability to find global suppliers to manufacture their products from its massive database of all companies that import goods into the U.S. Here at Jungle Scout, we have a tool called Supplier Database. headquarters of Minneapolis, Minnesota and Fort Worth, Texas, respectively.) Where do big brands get their products? (Spoiler: it might be from the same place) What if the two clocks, in fact, weren’t that different at all? Is it possible that Target and Pier 1 purchase their products from the same global factories? (And in case you were curious, no, Target and Pier 1 do not manufacture all of their own products in their U.S. Already I know that means it’s going to be a $200 replacement.Ĭan’t we just get one at Target, I beg. Where’d we get it from? “Pier 1 Imports!” I groan. My wife turned to me and said, “Well, obviously we need a new one.” Sure. It was one of those oversized farmhouse-style clocks kind of like something you’d see Joanna Gaines find on Fixer Upper, starting a massive new farmhouse clock trend. Hickenlooper says that although he would have liked the opportunity to direct Sling Blade, he doesn't begrudge Thornton's success: "He's a very talented actor and writer," he says.Ī bemused Thornton, meanwhile, finds the timing of the video release and the ensuing controversy somewhat ironic: "If (Sling Blade) had fallen on its ass, this wouldn't be happening now," he said.Recently, the clock in my living room broke. Thornton denies having given Lindeman such a promise. Lindeman, who says Thornton gave him an oral promise for first refusal on any feature script, says he is "very unhappy" with the way the Meistrich-Thornton deal came about and is weighing legal options. (Meistrich could not be reached for comment.) Meistrich and Thornton eventually clinched a deal to make the feature Sling Blade for $1.2 million, with Thornton as writer, director and star. Lindeman says he showed it to Larry Meistrich, who runs a New York-based production company called the Shooting Gallery. The short, meanwhile, received favorable attention at festivals in Aspen, Colo., San Diego and elsewhere. By the time the short debuted at the Sundance Film Festival in January 1994, the two barely were speaking, and they have not kept in touch since. Not long after filming wrapped in September 1993, Hickenlooper and his writer-star began to argue over the project, especially the editing of a key monologue in which Thornton's character narrates the story of his mother's murder. (Walsh reprised his role as a mental patient in Sling Blade, although Ringwald, who played a newspaper reporter, did not.) Walsh and Molly Ringwald joined Thornton in the cast. Hickenlooper and friends raised the $55,000 budget from several investors, including New York producer Adam Lindeman, who kicked in almost half the money.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |